whose orgasm is it anyway?
Jan. 31st, 2008 01:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Stumbled upon this article in the Times Online (UK) in which a 44-year-old woman laments the lack of orgasm in her sexual history. Twenty-odd lovers in her life (all male, I assume), and not a single orgasm. Well, maybe one, says she. She's not really sure.
"Oh Christ, oh bloody hell," as the colonel's daughter would say.
After reading the article (which I assume is some sort of excerpt from a book called Cutting Up Playgirl) I felt rather sorry for the poor thing. Wanted to make her tea, give her a maternal pat on the arm and perhaps suggest she try shagging women...of course, probably one of her evil ex-boyfriends forced some sort of humiliating threesome on her which left her scarred for life. Then I saw that surprisingly few of the comments were sympathetic toward her and since I am easily swayed (oh look, Kool-Aid! Is that rainbow dewdrops in them?), I started questioning my own sympathetic disposition. Gay/straight/whatev, we've all had our share of shitty sex encounters, and sometimes when you're with someone it does take a while to get things right, but...after so many years of smiling through horrible morning-afters (gratuitous, gauzy 70s flashback: There's GOT to be a morning after...) with men who behave like lizards (you need to read the article), I might consider hanging it up, so to speak, and keeping a steady date with a good vibrator. Or I might actually ask myself if, perhaps, there is something I'm doing (or not doing) that is contributing to that lack of satisfaction.
Or maybe I am just too focused on orgasms? Sex is about more than orgasms, isn't it? Yeah, I know, I'm just blowing smoke up your crack again.
"Oh Christ, oh bloody hell," as the colonel's daughter would say.
After reading the article (which I assume is some sort of excerpt from a book called Cutting Up Playgirl) I felt rather sorry for the poor thing. Wanted to make her tea, give her a maternal pat on the arm and perhaps suggest she try shagging women...of course, probably one of her evil ex-boyfriends forced some sort of humiliating threesome on her which left her scarred for life. Then I saw that surprisingly few of the comments were sympathetic toward her and since I am easily swayed (oh look, Kool-Aid! Is that rainbow dewdrops in them?), I started questioning my own sympathetic disposition. Gay/straight/whatev, we've all had our share of shitty sex encounters, and sometimes when you're with someone it does take a while to get things right, but...after so many years of smiling through horrible morning-afters (gratuitous, gauzy 70s flashback: There's GOT to be a morning after...) with men who behave like lizards (you need to read the article), I might consider hanging it up, so to speak, and keeping a steady date with a good vibrator. Or I might actually ask myself if, perhaps, there is something I'm doing (or not doing) that is contributing to that lack of satisfaction.
Or maybe I am just too focused on orgasms? Sex is about more than orgasms, isn't it? Yeah, I know, I'm just blowing smoke up your crack again.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 06:49 pm (UTC)Personally, having experienced orgasms myself, I'd miss them greatly were they to disappear entirely. But I don't know that I'd stop having sex, either with my partner or with myself. There are a lot of bits that feel really good, even if they don't hit the peak, so to speak. (Plus there are those other reasons: bonding, schmoopy lovey-ness, blah-blah etc.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 09:50 pm (UTC)Y'know, that's a very good point; I hadn't thought of it that way.
And there are a lot of good bits other than Teh Big Oh!
Other good bits...
Date: 2008-01-31 10:42 pm (UTC)Oh how you TEASE!!!!
Re: Other good bits...
Date: 2008-02-01 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 10:54 pm (UTC)Maybe if the book sells well... ?
You know. "If you write it, you will come."
nevermind.
*g*
*but that never would have happened.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:01 pm (UTC)Bwah! Maybe THAT should have been the title of her book!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-02 12:00 am (UTC)*GROAN*
sorry...
*g*
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 11:12 pm (UTC)Yeeeeesssss! I am so with the colonel's daughter!
I am just very sorry for the ol' gal. 20 lovers and no organsm? Man or woman, I imagine ONE of them should have managed after all that time.
She is still young- at 44, she, technically, should have a lot of Ohs left innher. Therefore, I conclude that she needs to spend some quality time by herself, figure out how she likes it, then venture out into the fray once again-- armed with new, valuable information!
Everything comes with instructions, these days...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 09:25 am (UTC)"Technically"? There's a technical use-by date ("best before")? I'm turning 45 in two weeks!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-02 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 11:02 pm (UTC)No! Of course, there isn't! Forgive me.
I've heard that 45 is the new 35!
I said "technically" because the poor thing is 44 and hasn't had an orgasm! So, there is potentially a technical problem there. :)
I'm turning 45 in two weeks!
Well, Happy Birthday!
I hope you get lot's of good, *technical* birthday happiness!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:05 pm (UTC)Yep, you're right on about that. I was wondering about that myself, if she does/did have orgasms while masturbating, or even if she does whack off.
Everything comes with instructions, these days...
Sad, innit? :)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 08:33 am (UTC)And yes, sex is about more than orgasms... but they're pretty damn important, in my opinion. If there is sex, and there is not at least one orgasm per person, then I myself would file that under "not-so-great sex" and resolve that next time better be soon and spectacular. (But maybe I am just spoiled by only shagging a girl?)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:10 pm (UTC)Ain't no maybe about it. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 09:24 am (UTC)No, I think she's not focused enough.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-01 03:20 pm (UTC)Yeah, there was a lot that little snippet in the Times didn't address, no doubt for lack of space. I wasn't raised Catholic, but that particular religion does seem to do a real number on a lot of women when it comes to sex!
Of course, 23 dud men in a row isn't out of the question either.
Hee, I suppose not, but it's really bad luck if it is! We could ask Joanie, she probably encountered similar long droughts in her line o'work. (Now that's an advice column I would read: "Ask Joanie Stubbs." Of course, Cy would probably write in with rude psychotic questions all the time...listen to me babble, and I don't have the excuse of 5 beers either...)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-03 02:17 am (UTC)Btw, mine were light beers so I didn't really have an excuse either. :)